Mark Paul – Proposition 33 Would End State Limits on Rent Control

October 1, 2024

Prop Fest is a collaboration from Bay Curious and The Bay podcasts, where we break down each of the 10 statewide propositions that will be on your November 2024 ballot. Check out KQED’s Voter Guide for more information on state and local races.

Today, reporter Vanessa Rancaño helps us understand what’s at stake in Proposition 32, which would remove state limits on rent control that have been in place since 1995, and give power back to local governments to enact or change rent control policies.

Olivia Allen-Price: Ya know, Bay Curious actually did an explainer that covered some of those things about rent control back in 2018. So I would say if the efficacy of rent control is really important to how you vote, you might go give that a listen for some additional context. We’ll link to it in our show notes or just head online and search something like: “Bay Curious Rent Control 2018” and it should be the first thing that pops up.

Vanessa Rancaño: Yes, that is a great overview of the arguments. I think the only thing I would add is that more recently we have seen some economists come forward to argue that there is research and there are real world examples that refute this traditional narrative, which they say is based more on economic theory than empirical evidence.

Mark Paul is a Rutgers economist who studies rent control and also very much supports it.

Mark Paul: Most mainstream economists are taught these theoretical models where perfect competition exists, there’s no such thing as market power, you know where landlords have more power than renters. In their models that they’re thinking about this there’s unlimited supply of affordable housing, homelessness doesn’t exist, and corporate landlords that use algorithmic pricing to jack prices up, something that we see the Federal Trade Commission going after corporate landlords for, things like that can’t exist because they would just get outcompeted. But I think people underestimate the bias most economists have against government intervention.

KQED Prop Fest, October 1, 2024

Recent Posts

Elizabeth (Libby) Vinson (MPAP ’02) Named CEO of NJACP

From New Jersey Business Magazine, July 15, 2025 Vinson Named CEO of NJ Association of Community Providers The New Jersey Association of Community Providers (NJACP), Ewing, the statewide not-for-profit organization that represents community-based providers who care...

From Fear to Freedom and Hope: Rafael Escalante (UG PP ’26)

Pursuing a college education and the American dream, Rafael Escalante departed the embattled South American nation and made his way to New Jersey Rafael Escalante escaped politically motivated persecution as a teenager in Venezuela to find his place – and a brighter...

NJSPL: Mapping Corporate Landlords in New Jersey

by Eric Seymour As part of our ongoing research project supported by the New Jersey State Policy Lab, we are examining the growth of corporate ownership in the state’s small residential property market. Our focus is on 1- to 4-unit properties, which, in addition to...

Samuel and Colleagues Examine the Rise of AI Phobia

Abstract Contemporary public discourse surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) often exhibits a disproportionate level of fear and confusion relative to AI’s factually documented capabilities and implications. This study examines how the systematic use of alarmist...

Ralph, Johnson-Rodriguez Research ASE Perceptions

Do perceptions of speeding act as a barrier to automated speed enforcement in the United States? Highlights Many American adults do not believe speeding is particularly dangerous. Yet 65% of respondents believe their community should vote for automated speed...