Fixing lead in the water and other NJ debt obligations

October 21, 2019

Let me first say I support a bond issue to address the lead water crisis. We must address these problems in homes, on properties and in schools. The governor has indicated that $500 million in new debt is needed for the first part of the problem. He notes a further $100 million needs to be allocated for local schools from the $500 million bond act approved by the voters last November. 

I endorse these expenditures because I am a father, a grandfather, and a citizen — and it is the moral action to take.

However, viewing the issue from my professional background, I would ask at least three questions: does this amount solve the problem or do we need more — or do we even know? How does this new debt impact our existing debt load? Why does the state not have a six-year capital plan that includes all the capital needs of the state, including these needs? 

NorthJersey.com, Opinion by Richard Keevey, October 18, 2019

Recent Posts

Sophia Jones, Committed to Cultural Competence

Sophia Jones, PhD, has been a Public Health part-time lecturer at the Bloustein School since 2016. She was recently featured on "Meet the People of Rutgers." Sophia Jones, Committed to Cultural Competence Jeff Arban/Rutgers University The Basics Title: Program...

Upcoming Events

Event Series CAREERS

Career Virtual Drop-ins

Virtual

Bloustein Career Development Specialists Cheryl Egan and Andrea Garrido will be in a Zoom Room on Monday's beginning January 22, 2024 (excluding holidays and spring break) to answer questions, provide […]