Opinion: The county line is dead. So why is the Legislature revisiting NJ ballots? | Stile

October 21, 2024

Now that the county line is headed to the dustbin of state history, leaders of the Assembly have created a bipartisan committee that will explore new ways to design ballots for New Jersey primaries.

The Legislature, which often operates with dead-of-night efficiency, now wants to hear from everybody — election experts, good government advocates who have led the crusade against the antiquated county line ballot and “hardworking professionals who ensure we have fair elections.” The lawmakers want to do their homework on this one, it seems.

They plan to bring in an expert on ballot design to testify. County election officials from both parties will be summoned to explain the lessons learned from the 2024 primary, when a federal judge ruled out the old county line system and ordered new — and fairer — block ballot designs for the Democratic primary.

This may sound like a topic for nerd insomniacs who watch C-SPAN panel discussions at 2 a.m., but, in fact, the crumbling of the line was a seismic moment in New Jersey politics. It was the powerful, coveted tool party bosses used for decades to ensure smooth, almost automatic victories for their preferred candidates…

Julia Sass Rubin, the Rutgers professor whose research into the county line became crucial evidence in Kim’s lawsuit, also had doubts about the Legislature’s vow to lead the way to a new day of ballot reform.

Still, Sass Rubin says Quraishi’s ruling looms as an important backstop over the panel. Any questionable remedies pursued by the Legislature would most likely have to comport with Quraishi’s order — as Coughlin indicated. And it just may open the door to a wider discussion of reform. Already, activists are compiling wish lists for discussion and reform.

Sass Rubin would like to see the ballot draw of names be handled by computer, a move that would eliminate the potential of human error or chicanery. And she argues that the names in the ballot blocks should be randomized — or shuffled so that random candidates are listed first in the block on a district-by-district basis. That way, she says, no single candidate gets the advantage of being listed first throughout the town or voting area.

“The line is just one of the ways you can distort the ballot,” she said. “So I think we just have to be incredibly vigilant, and there’s good reason to be concerned.”

North Jersey.com, October 21, 2024

Recent Posts

Christiana Foglio, DC’84, BSPPP’86 Named RAA Loyal Daughter

The Rutgers Alumni Association’s Loyal Sons & Daughters Award is its highest recognition of service. Recipients are individuals who have made a meaningful and long-standing contribution to the betterment of Rutgers by performing extraordinary volunteer service or...

Lindenfeld Investigates LFO Impacts on Health Outcomes

Legal Financial Obligations: An Understudied Public Health Exposure Abstract The impacts of exposure to the criminal justice system on health-related outcomes are well studied in the United States (US). However, while previous studies focus on the impacts of arrest,...

EJB Talks: Beyond “Does It Work?”

Beyond “Does It Work?”: Laura Peck on Policy, Evidence, and Impact EJB Talks returns for Season 14 with Dean Stuart Shapiro speaking with Laura Peck, one of our newest Public Policy Associate Professors and a Principal Faculty Fellow with the Heldrich Center for...

Heldrich Center: Motivational Texts and Unemployment

Original post from the Daily Targum By Akash Nattamai Researchers at the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development recently published a report regarding the effectiveness of motivational text messaging on reintroducing people in the statewide Reemployment...