Here's how federal agencies can write more effective regulations — and win regulatory battles in …

June 18, 2019

Second, placing economists in a separate unit where they are managed by other economists frees them to conduct more objective analysis. That’s what Rutgers political scientist Stuart Shapiro found when he interviewed 16 economists and 16 environmental assessors in federal agencies for his 2016 book “Analysis and Public Policy.” It’s harder to be objective when your performance is evaluated by the decision-makers whose proposals you must analyze.

The Washington Post, June 17, 2019

Recent Posts

Grafova and Williams Examine Medical Debt in New Study

Household economic security and medical debt onset: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic Abstract Objectives To examine how household medical debt responds to changes in income and new health events. Study design Secondary analysis of a panel survey. Methods We analyzed...

Peck, Co-Authors Evaluate Studies Designed to Detect Earnings Impact

Designing Studies to Detect Impacts on Earnings Abstract This article reports empirical evidence to support the design of evaluations that estimate the impacts of programs that provide postsecondary credentials and/or job training on earnings. Statistical power...

New Jersey Target Zero Commission Adopts Action Plan

On Monday, December 15, 2025, the New Jersey Target Zero Commission officially adopted the first New Jersey Target Zero Action Plan, reaching a major milestone in the State’s goal to eliminate all roadway fatalities and serious injuries in the state by 2040. The New...

Translation as Access: Meet Kenia Gonzalez

Kenia Gonzalez recently joined the Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center as its Bilingual Outreach Specialist. We spoke with her about her role and why language access plays a critical part in VTC’s work. Kenia leads Spanish-language translation, interpretation,...