Workshop on negotiation and conflict resolution teaches graduate students how identify issues, alternatives

November 15, 2017

Have you ever tried to explain your point of view, but couldn’t find the right way to say it? Sanford Jaffe and Linda Stamato, co-directors of the Bloustein School’s Center for Negotiation and Conflict Resolution and members of the school’s graduate faculty, led a workshop to expose Bloustein students to constructive negotiation, consensus building, and problem-solving approaches to conflicts.

Stamato, a graduate of Rutgers University and New York University, has served as a consultant to the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations and as Chairman of the Board of Governors at Rutgers University. Jaffe, a graduate of Harvard Law School, is the author of several publications in the fields of dispute resolution, public interest law, and legal education, and is also a member of the New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on Dispute Resolution.

Students with varied educational backgrounds–from planning and policy to health administration to social work–attended the workshop. Jaffe and Stamato asked the attendees what intrigued them to attend. One planning student said, “I am interested in transportation. In the future, if I want to change something as simple as a parking space, I know I am going to face issues, so I want to establish skills to get past those barriers.”

Jaffe and Stamato told the participants they would try their best to fit a 16-week course into a two-hour workshop to give them a taste of their class. They began by explaining the steps of Interest Based Negotiation:

  1. Identify and pursue interests, not solely positions
  2. Frame issues for constructive negotiation
  3. Use objective criteria (e.g., CPI, comp salary, etc.)
  4. Generate options
  5. Identify and use your alternatives to a negotiated agreement
  6. Preserve and strengthen relationships, especially if they matter because you may need something from this person in the long run.

Jaffe and Stamato explained that the importance of objective criteria is to avoid biases, and that the more options given means an opportunity to meet the needs of everyone in a case. “Keep in mind,” they said, “BATNA.” BATNA stands for Best Alternative to the Negotiated Agreement, which introduces parties to a problem-solving process and seeks to mitigate any issues.

After explaining the overall process of negotiation and conflict resolution, the attendees broke into groups to role-play and arbitrate a case. The purpose of the exercise was to familiarize students with arbitration and mediation, and how each process impacts the result. An arbitrator tells parties what they expect will be the end result. A mediator helps the parties in leading a conversation and giving a team-building energy to the situation. Arbitrators typically hide information during a case. Mediators are more transparent and willing to disclose more information. Arbitrators want to win the case. Mediators want to solve it.

Stamato noted, “If you win in court, you don’t actually win because the problem continues…only in a different direction.” Jaffe and Stamato mentioned they spend a lot of time in class discussing how to deal with difficult people. They asked the attendees what they would suggest their potential clients do to think creatively in proposing a solution. One attendee suggested that each party list what they want from the negotiation and what they feel the opposing party wants. Stamato agreed and added, “This is one of the four ways to deal with litigation; acknowledging what the other side wants.” Jaffe also agreed, explaining that effective negotiators ask questions to bring conversations alive, not simply to try to nail-down a win.

Jaffe and Stamato acknowledged that mediation isn’t an easy process and resistance is expected, but it does not mean it cannot be mitigated. “Always try and build trust and credibility with the parities to give them the confidence to move the conversation forward.”

Sanford Jaffe and Linda Stamato have an open-door policy on this topic and welcome students who may wish to discuss this and related topics on a one-to-one basis.

Anna Quan, a first-year planning student commented, “This workshop/class is useful for both professional and personal life. Knowing the language and process can help us with future problems.”

Recent Posts

NJSPL: New Jersey Policy Priorities Survey Results

By Angie Nga Le Between October 7 and November 14, 2024, the New Jersey State Policy Lab conducted a brief survey to gain insights into emerging issues and policy priorities in New Jersey. The survey aimed to inform the Policy Lab’s strategic research planning,...

Dr. Grafova Examines Financial Hardships for Cancer Survivors

Household income and county income inequality are associated with financial hardship among cancer survivors in New Jersey Abstract Purpose To examine how household income and county income inequality are linked to financial hardship among cancer survivors. Methods...

Exploring Postsecondary Outcomes of Dual-Enrollment

Heldrich Report: Exploring Postsecondary Outcomes of Dual-Enrollment Participation in New Jersey A new study from the New Jersey Statewide Data System (NJSDS) explores the educational pathways of New Jersey high school graduates from 2014 and 2015 who participated in...

“Rutgers Then and Now:” A Discussion with the Authors

“Rutgers Then and Now”: A Discussion with Authors James W. Hughes and David Listokin As 2024 comes to a close and EJB Talks concludes another season, Stuart Shapiro discusses the new book by University Professor and Bloustein School Dean Emeritus James W. Hughes and...

NJSPL Report: Transportation Priorities for Camden County

By Carla Villacis, Kristin Curtis, Shaghayegh Poursabbagh, Oğuz Kaan Özalp, and Fawaz Al-Juaid Read Report The Senator Walter Rand Institute for Public Affairs at Rutgers-Camden (WRI) exists to conduct community-focused research that connects to the public policy and...

Upcoming Events

2025 Bloustein Alumni Awards Celebration

Zimmerli Art Museum at Rutgers University 71 Hamilton Street, New Brunswick, NJ, United States

Since 1994, the Bloustein School Alumni Association has aimed to present awards to accomplished alumni each year. Our goal is to pay tribute to alumni and friends to recognize their […]

RAISE 2025 – Our Future With AI: Utopian or Dystopian?

Gov. James J. Florio Special Events Forum, CSB 33 Livingston Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ, United States

Informatics - Data Science - AI Competition Step into the future of innovation! RAISE-25 will challenge you to unravel the scope of AI's impact on our lives and human society. […]