Research: Resisting neoliberal education reform in Newark and Camden

September 22, 2019

In their article, “What enables communities to resist neoliberal education reforms? Lessons from Newark and Camden, New Jersey” (Journal of Urban Affairs, April 2019), Bloustein School Associate Professor Julia Sass Rubin and Stephen Danley (Rutgers, Camden) examine the political factors that allow communities to resist undemocratic education governance mechanisms that are used to implement a neoliberal educational agenda.

What enables communities to resist neoliberal education reforms? Lessons from Newark and Camden, New Jersey

Danley and Rubin note that “neoliberal education reformers advance a set of strategies intended to improve public education by incorporating market-based approaches. To facilitate the adoption of these often unpopular ideas, neoliberal reformers advocate for governance mechanisms that make it more challenging for communities to control their public schools. The prevalence of such undemocratic governance mechanisms has grown over the last decade, undercutting communities’ efforts to organize in opposition to the neoliberal education agenda. However, these governance mechanisms do not necessarily shut down the organizing.”

Danley and Rubin argue that it is important to understand what enables sustained community resistance to neoliberal education reform to exist in the presence of such undemocratic governance mechanisms, in order to help build an infrastructure supportive of such organizing. “Even when that infrastructure is present, grassroots organizers often face an uphill climb. Lacking that infrastructure tips the scales overwhelmingly away from communities and toward the neoliberal education reformers.”

They find that “social and economic capital and access to information are critical for creating conditions that enable sustained resistance under undemocratic governance mechanisms.” They “also identify an additional factor that helps explain the different levels of community resistance in Camden and Newark: the role of parochial and oppressive politics that include retaliatory tactics that undermine resistance.”

Recent Posts

Samuel, Thakuriah Lead Discussions at RAD Collaboratory

The 𝐑𝐮𝐭𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐒𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 (𝐑𝐀𝐃) 𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 recently hosted its inaugural Research Symposium on 3/24/26 - an amazing event that has sparked much interest in collaborative research with AI as a matchmaking catalyst....

Bulger et al. Examine Food Security, Sovereignty as Climate Adaptation

Bridging Western and Indigenous epistemologies in an opaque world Food security and food sovereignty as climate adaptation Abstract Food security and food sovereignty represent two similar but distinct pathways for community-led climate adaptation. This study examines...

Advancing Women’s Equity Through Policymaking: An NJSPL Panel

In response to an invitation from the Douglass Residential College and the Institute for Women's Leadership to host programs focused on women's issues at Rutgers University in honor of Women's History Month, the New Jersey State Policy Lab convened a panel of recent...

Real-World Insights in Global Freight Movement

On Monday, March 23, supply chain leaders from Johnson & Johnson provided real-world insights to Anne Strauss-Wieder’s graduate Freights & Ports class to break down the realities of  pharmaceutical production and global freight movement. Rutgers alumni Lisa...

Pfeiffer Demystifies Property Taxes on IssuesWatch Podcast

New Jersey is famous for many things, but its nation-leading property tax rates usually top the list of resident grievances. In this episode, we sit down with Marc Pfeiffer, senior policy fellow at the Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, to demystify the...