Kopp Opinion: Trump Is Attacking Climate Science. Scientists Are Fighting Back.

March 2, 2026

Trump Is Attacking Climate Science. Scientists Are Fighting Back.

It’s easy, looking at the past year, to see the damage the administration has done. But researchers are also stepping up, trying to fill the gaps.

For over 75 years, the United States has been a global leader in climate change research. In the 1950s, scientists at the University of California showed that carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere were increasing and established the first long-term CO2 monitoring system, while Norman Phillips at the Institute for Advanced Studies developed the first computer model of the global climate. The U.S. soon launched three of the world’s top climate modeling centers: the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory in 1955 (based in Princeton since 1968); the National Science Foundation’s Boulder-based National Center for Atmospheric Research in 1960; and NASA’s New York City–based Goddard Institute for Space Studies in 1961. By 1965, it was clear—in the words of President Johnson’s Science Advisory Committee—that humankind was “unwittingly conducting a vast geophysical experiment” with potentially “deleterious” consequences. In 1990, Congress established the U.S. Global Change Research Program to better understand these changes and figure out how to protect human, economic, and planetary health.

As climate change has grown from a distant threat to a present danger, federal support for global change research also grew: from about $1 billion in 1990 to $2.6 billion per year in the 2010s, peaking at $4.3 billion in 2023. Over the decades, NASA and NOAA have produced crucial records of changes in atmosphere, sea level, greenhouse gas emissions, and more. Among many other benefits, U.S. investments in climate research have helped cities design flood protection, farmers make cropping decisions, and communities prepare for hurricanes.

Then came the second Trump administration…

Read the full opinion piece by Robert Kopp on New Republic, March 1, 2026

Recent Posts

Samuel, Thakuriah Lead Discussions at RAD Collaboratory

The 𝐑𝐮𝐭𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐒𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 (𝐑𝐀𝐃) 𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 recently hosted its inaugural Research Symposium on 3/24/26 - an amazing event that has sparked much interest in collaborative research with AI as a matchmaking catalyst....

Bulger et al. Examine Food Security, Sovereignty as Climate Adaptation

Bridging Western and Indigenous epistemologies in an opaque world Food security and food sovereignty as climate adaptation Abstract Food security and food sovereignty represent two similar but distinct pathways for community-led climate adaptation. This study examines...

Advancing Women’s Equity Through Policymaking: An NJSPL Panel

In response to an invitation from the Douglass Residential College and the Institute for Women's Leadership to host programs focused on women's issues at Rutgers University in honor of Women's History Month, the New Jersey State Policy Lab convened a panel of recent...

Real-World Insights in Global Freight Movement

On Monday, March 23, supply chain leaders from Johnson & Johnson provided real-world insights to Anne Strauss-Wieder’s graduate Freights & Ports class to break down the realities of  pharmaceutical production and global freight movement. Rutgers alumni Lisa...

Pfeiffer Demystifies Property Taxes on IssuesWatch Podcast

New Jersey is famous for many things, but its nation-leading property tax rates usually top the list of resident grievances. In this episode, we sit down with Marc Pfeiffer, senior policy fellow at the Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, to demystify the...