Research: The Dark Side of Sentiment Analysis: An Exploratory Review Using Lexicons, Dictionaries, and a Statistical Monkey and Chimp

January 18, 2022

by Marcia Hannigan

Sentiment analysis (SA) uses a combination of natural language processing (NLP) methods to analyze a text to estimate the implied sentiment. Sentiment may be classified into categories such as positive, negative or neutral, or be measured by a range of numerical scores.  It is used frequently in business to determine consumer attitudes towards products where data such as customer reviews may be too voluminous for traditional analysis, but the use of SA and NLP helps to identify meaningful trends.  

SA can be used to analyze a wide range of texts, including short snippets of text such as Twitter feeds to generate meaningful insights. A new study by Jim Samuel (Rutgers University), Gavin C. Rozzi (Rutgers University),  Ratnakar Palle (Apple, Inc.) in SSRN (Jan. 2022) reviews known issues with SA as documented by prior research and then compares the application of multiple of-the-shelf lexicon and dictionary methods to stock market and vaccine tweets. The intention of this research is to identify and discuss critical aspects of the “dark side” of SA and develop a conceptual discussion of the characteristics of the dark side.

The study demonstrates flaws with a plug-and-play approach to SA and concludes with notes on conceptual solutions for the dark side of SA. It points to future strategies that could be used to improve the accuracy of SA. This research can help align researcher and practitioner expectations to understand the limits and boundaries of NLP-based solutions for sentiment analysis and estimation.

The study concludes that lexicons and dictionaries help in implementing sentiment analysis. While an in-depth analysis of SA is necessary before drawing conclusions, it is important to know the limits of SA methods and tools. SA modeling may need to be customized for some situations while acknowledging the absence of satisfactory SA solutions for other situations. SA tools are very useful and must continue to be used for research and practice – however, as demonstrated and described in this study, it is vital to understand the conflicts and ways to acknowledge and address them.

It is expected that this study will lead to deeper attention to applied SA and spur new strategies for the improvement of sentiment analysis research and practice.

Read the full study.

Recent Posts

“Work Trends RU” Podcast with Gov. Murphy

Heldrich Center for Workforce Development has launched its new podcast series, "Work Trends RU," exploring the changing worlds of work, education, social policy, and financial security. The series covers a variety of issues, including the contemporary workforce,...

New Jersey Micromobility Guide – Bike Ped Resource Center

From NJ Bicycle and Pedestrian Resource Center New Jersey Micromobility Guide (2025) The New Jersey Micromobility Guide serves as a resource for micromobility users across the state, collecting and summarizing the laws and safety best practices that can make riders...

Gov. Murphy Proclaims May NJ Walk and Bike Month

From New Jersey Safe Routes to School Celebrate Bike Month and New Jersey Walk and Bike to School Month this May Governor Phil Murphy has proclaimed May as Bike Month and New Jersey Walk and Bike to School Month. Go outside to get some exercise and enjoy the beautiful...

From Public Health Research to Real-World Impact

From Public Health Research to Real-World Impact: A Conversation with Melinda Rushing In our final episode of EJB Talks for this semester, Dean Stuart Shapiro speaks with Professor Melinda Rushing, a new faculty member in the school's health administration program....

New Jersey State Policy Lab Annual Report

As the New Jersey State Policy Lab (NJSPL) reaches its fourth anniversary, it is my honor to serve as the Executive Director, working with an incredible team of dedicated professionals to better understand and investigate policy issues impacting the state. The NJSPL...