University Operating Status

The university remains open. For changes to schedules, including remote instruction and operations due to expected weather conditions, check rutgers.edu/status and https://newbrunswick.rutgers.edu/operating-status for updates.

Research from Ralph: The Deal Breaker Theory of Cycling

May 21, 2025

The deal breaker theory of cycling: A new approach to understanding bike behavior

Highlights

  • Biking research suffers from issues like perfect prediction and tautological variables.
  • People determine whether to bike by comparing needs to prevailing conditions.
  • Needs include Safety, Comfort, Relative Convenience, Tools, and Social Approval.
  • A single deficit is a deal-breaker. If one need isn’t met, someone will not bike.
  • Scholars should determine the distribution of needs and how they vary over time.

Abstract

Most locations across the world have a large un-tapped pool of people who do not bike at all and an even larger pool who do not bike for transportation. To increase cycling, we must better understand this group and the reasons they do not ride. I propose a new theory that suggests everyone has a list of “must-haves” that must be in place before they will bike. While there are many possible cycling needs, I introduce five in this paper: Safety, Comfort, Relative Convenience, Availability of Tools, and Social Approval. These needs are uncorrelated (needs in one domain are independent of needs in another) and not uniformly distributed (some people have high needs, while others have low). I argue that potential cyclists periodically compare their needs to prevailing conditions. In some areas, prevailing conditions meet the needs of many people (e.g., Copenhagen or Amsterdam). Elsewhere, conditions meet the needs of very few. The theory gets its name from the idea that any unmet need is a deal breaker. The theory usefully explains commonplace patterns of biking behaviors and visualizes how pro-cycling interventions improve prevailing conditions. The theory also overcomes a number of methodological problems plaguing current bike behavior research. Scholars should work to document the distribution of cycling needs and explore how needs and views of prevailing conditions change over time. Finally, scholars should work to quantify how many people will have their needs met from different pro-cycling interventions.

Citation

Kelcie M. Ralph, The deal breaker theory of cycling: A new approach to understanding bike behavior, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Volume 31, 2025, 101462, ISSN 2590-1982, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101462.

Recent Posts

Christiana Foglio, DC’84, BSPPP’86 Named RAA Loyal Daughter

The Rutgers Alumni Association’s Loyal Sons & Daughters Award is its highest recognition of service. Recipients are individuals who have made a meaningful and long-standing contribution to the betterment of Rutgers by performing extraordinary volunteer service or...

Lindenfeld Investigates LFO Impacts on Health Outcomes

Legal Financial Obligations: An Understudied Public Health Exposure Abstract The impacts of exposure to the criminal justice system on health-related outcomes are well studied in the United States (US). However, while previous studies focus on the impacts of arrest,...

EJB Talks: Beyond “Does It Work?”

Beyond “Does It Work?”: Laura Peck on Policy, Evidence, and Impact EJB Talks returns for Season 14 with Dean Stuart Shapiro speaking with Laura Peck, one of our newest Public Policy Associate Professors and a Principal Faculty Fellow with the Heldrich Center for...

Heldrich Center: Motivational Texts and Unemployment

Original post from the Daily Targum By Akash Nattamai Researchers at the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development recently published a report regarding the effectiveness of motivational text messaging on reintroducing people in the statewide Reemployment...