Research: Reviving more than rationalitiy–using cost-benefit analysis to evaluate regulations

November 12, 2021

by Marcia Hannigan

In a blog post for the Yale Journal on Regulation titled “Reviving More Than Rationality,” Stuart Shapiro comments on Michael Livermore and Richard Revesz’s book Reviving Rationality: Saving Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Sake of the Environment and Our Health. The book offers observations regarding the use of cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the effects of regulations on the U.S. and its economy.

Cost-benefit analysis became particularly contentious during the Trump administration.  The idea that some government employees had the expertise and were neutral in their application of cost-benefit analysis was regarded by the Trump administration with antipathy.

The administration ignored cost-benefit analysis in favor of “cost analysis” of regulation.  Benefits of regulation or legislation were not considered. Additionally, much of the cost-benefit analyses done during this period were deeply flawed. Scientific knowledge and the idea of a neutral civil service were also deeply suspect during the Trump administration.  The response to the Covid-19 pandemic and the denial of human-caused climate change derailed attempts to address these crises. 

These views, coupled with the disdain for the expertise of civil servants, led to the attempt to reclassify civil servants as “Schedule F” employees, making them subject to easier dismissal and replacement. The Trump administration was so suspicious of civil service employees and “neutral” cost-benefit analysis that the first agency it looked to clear out was the Office of Management and Budget, the home to the very agency responsible for doing cost-benefit analysis, the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA).

Some economists argue that scientific experts are too quick to tout the benefits of laws and regulations but slow to acknowledge the costs.  While the Trump administration was not ultimately successful in its attempts to defenestrate OIRA, it did lead to political benefits for those seeking to strengthen the executive branch’s hold on policy.  It questions the idea of neutrality and expertise and has fostered a large political realignment in opposition to both. 

For more information about regulation, cost-benefit analysis and expertise, visit to read the full blog post.

Recent Posts

Heldrich Report: NJ’s Energy-Efficiency Workforce Needs

New Jersey's Energy-Efficiency Workforce Needs, Infrastructure, and Equity Assessment New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy’s Energy Master Plan and Executive Order 315 set a goal to reduce fossil fuel usage to 100% clean energy by 2035. The Executive Order also called for...

Shaul Picker Receives 2024 Mortensen-Voorhees Award

Shaul Picker is the 2024 recipient of the Mortensen-Voorhees Award for Achievement in Transportation Studies. This award is granted annually to the highest-achieving student with a concentration in transportation at the Edward J. Bloustein School of Urban Planning and...

NJSPL – Key Insights from Early Offshore Wind Implementation

By Jessica Parineet Offshore wind development is in its early stages in the United States, with just under one gigawatt (GW) of utility scale capacity constructed. State decarbonization goals have catalyzed industry progress thus far, however the Biden administration...

EJB Talks: Political Update with Stuart Shapiro and Amy Cobb

Analyzing Trump's Guilty Verdict and the 2024 Election Outlook Stuart Shapiro welcomes back Amy Cobb MPAP '18 for a political update in the final EJB Talks episode of the spring 2024 season. They discuss the potential consequences of Trump's guilty verdict for...

Racial composition of road users, traffic citations, and police stops

Significance This study pioneers in mapping the racial composition of roads. Our findings highlight a disproportionate rate of citations for moving violations among Black drivers through both speed camera enforcement but more so via police stops, challenging the...

Upcoming Events