GenAI, Ingenuity, the Law, and Unintended Consequences

August 13, 2024

III. SPECIAL ISSUE TWO: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF INNOVATIONS
Spearheaded under the leadership of Clinton J. Andrews, a second special issue, which although connected to the first, rightfully commands its own set of viewers captivated by the topic of unexpected results stemming from innovation.Andrews’ work is neither situated solely on GenAI, nor on the broader topic of emerging technologies (Fig. 1), which so often preoccupies our attention in this space, but on innovation per se. In fact, Carvalko and Andrews both concur that there are positive and negative unintended consequences of innovation.

Andrews begins by asking the age-old question: “If people want the benefits of innovations, must they simply accept the unintended adverse consequences”? He implies that there
are certain tools and techniques that could assist designers in addressing challenges before they take root, so that the challenges may be easily preventable before diffusion of an innovation into the market. And yet there is a full realization that not all businesses adopt such preventive strategies toward what he terms “spillover effects”. He is a realist in so far as summing up the present situation- deploy first, worry about teething problems later. In this reactive mode, Andrews states, jurisprudence is busy remediating the blatant wrongs. And while it might well look like an ethical problem at its root, the development of poor digital applications or services may well be more about an organization’s competencies or incentives in their workforce. Andrews brings to light various methodologies and tools that can be employed to anticipate the unintended consequences of innovation. His fundamental proposition emphasizes that it is crucial to address any potential challenges prior to or soon after the introduction of a new invention, thus alleviating harm to stakeholders before the core features become firmly established. Just as Carvalko’s paper
frames his special issue, Andrews’ peer reviewed paper does likewise in introducing three additional papers with a mixture of positive and negative social implications.

Read Article

Citation

K. Michael, J. R. Carvalko, C. J. Andrews and L. Batley, “In the Special Issues: GenAI, Ingenuity, the Law, and Unintended Consequences,” in IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 149-155, June 2024, doi: 10.1109/TTS.2024.3413268. keywords: {Special issues and sections; Generative AI;Biometrics (access control); Security;Artificial intelligence;Creativity;Law},

Recent Posts

Zhang et al. Study Street-View Greenspace and Exercise

GPS-based street-view greenspace exposure and wearable assessed physical activity in a prospective cohort of US women Abstract Background Increasing evidence positively links greenspace and physical activity (PA). However, most studies use measures of greenspace, such...

NJSPL: Some College, No Credential Population in NJ

Overview of the Some College, No Credential Population and Educational Outcomes in New Jersey, 2023–2024 New Jersey State Policy Lab Supporting New Jersey residents in returning to college after leaving without a credential has been an increasing focus of the state’s...

Loh and Noland Explore Public Charging Station Disparities

Equal charging for all: Are there income-based disparities in public charging stations? Abstract We compare charging station accessibility for different income groups in the San Francisco Bay Area. Using a microsimulation model, we estimate charging station...

Heldrich Center Releases New Work Trends Brief and Website

The Heldrich Center for Workforce Development is pleased to announce the availability of two new research products resulting from its long-running public opinion polling series, Work Trends. To better understand the public’s attitudes about work, employers, and the...

NJSPL Report: Analyzing the Use and Equity of ARPA Funds

Report Release: Analyzing the Use and Equity of ARPA Funds in NJ Local Governments and Beyond New Jersey State Policy Lab The American Rescue Plan Act’s Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA-SLFRF) represent a historic $350 billion investment to...