NJSPL Report: Investor Acquisition of Residential Properties

December 11, 2025

Report Release: Trends in Investor Acquisition of Residential Properties in New Jersey

Read Report

Corporate ownership of single-family homes and other small residential properties has drawn growing concern from housing advocates and policymakers in New Jersey and nationally. While the large rental home companies that sprang up in the aftermath of the foreclosure crisis are virtually absent from New Jersey, prior research has found that corporate owners account for a rising share of property sales in Newark (Trout & Nelson, 2022) and of ownership of small residential properties in multiple jurisdictions across the state (New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, 2022). These trends have raised concerns about investors competing for the state’s already limited stock of moderately priced homes, making homeownership even harder to attain, and about rental conditions, as corporate landlords are often associated with stricter screening, higher rents and fees, and faster resort to eviction.

This report analyzes corporate ownership of 1–4-unit residential properties in New Jersey, excluding condominiums, using parcel-level property tax data from 2012 to 2022. It examines how the share of corporate-owned homes has changed over time, how corporate entities fit within the broader landscape of owner-occupants and non-corporate investors, and how properties have moved into corporate ownership, distinguishing the conversion of existing rentals from the loss of owner-occupied housing. The analysis also assesses portfolio size as a measure of market power and considers whether corporate owners are local, in-state, or out-of-state, raising questions about absentee ownership and accountability to tenants, neighborhoods, and municipalities.

Key Findings
  • Although still under 4% of the stock statewide, corporate ownership of 1–4-unit residential properties more than doubled between 2012 and 2022.
  • Corporate ownership is most heavily concentrated in urban centers and in some shore communities.
  • About half of the properties that became corporate-owned between 2012 and 2022 had previously been owner-occupied, while roughly 30% had been owned by non-corporate investors.
  • Among owner-occupied homes in 2012, many transitioned to investor ownership by 2022, with a notable share shifting to corporate ownership.
  • Net growth in non-corporate investor ownership was modest, as many of their 2012 holdings converted to owner-occupancy by 2022.
  • Not all growth in corporate ownership reflects loss of owner-occupied housing; in many municipalities it also reflects transfers among investors, including consolidation of existing rental stock.
  • Corporate ownership grew fastest in municipalities that had lower home values and larger renter shares in 2012.
  • Most corporate investors own only one or a few properties, but in some municipalities large portfolio holders account for a significant share of corporate-owned homes.
  • Most corporate-owned properties are held by local or in-state owners, though out-of-state ownership is notably higher in shore communities and border areas.
Policy Recommendations
  • Improve transparency and accountability: Require disclosure of beneficial owners, expand and standardize landlord registries, and strengthen enforcement so municipalities can identify and hold corporate landlords accountable.
  • Protect homeownership opportunities: Give households and nonprofits a first chance to buy, expand down payment and rehab assistance, and support nonprofit intermediaries to keep homes affordable.
  • Safeguard renters: Cap excessive fees, strengthen enforcement of rent stabilization and habitability standards, eliminate loopholes that exempt corporate-owned small properties from local protections, and penalize investors that leave properties neglected.

Together, these measures can help ensure that New Jersey’s small residential housing stock serves as a pathway to stable and affordable housing for both homeowners and renters, while avoiding blanket bans on corporate ownership that could unintentionally reduce the supply of well-managed rental housing.

Authors

  • Eric Seymour is an associate professor in the Urban Planning and Policy Department at the Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy.

  • Will Payne is an assistant professor of Geographic Information Science (GIS) at the Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy.

Recent Posts

EJB Talks: Beyond “Does It Work?”

Beyond “Does It Work?”: Laura Peck on Policy, Evidence, and Impact EJB Talks returns for Season 14 with Dean Stuart Shapiro speaking with Laura Peck, one of our newest Public Policy Associate Professors and a Principal Faculty Fellow with the Heldrich Center for...

Heldrich Center: Motivational Texts and Unemployment

Original post from the Daily Targum By Akash Nattamai Researchers at the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development recently published a report regarding the effectiveness of motivational text messaging on reintroducing people in the statewide Reemployment...

Guest Speaker Lerrel Pinto: Robot Data is Not Enough Data

How can robots make physical labor easier for humans? This past week, Prof. Lerrel Pinto gave a talk at the Bloustein School titled "Robot Data is Not Enough Data." Lerrel Pinto is the co-founder of Assured Robot Intelligence (ARI) and an Assistant Professor of...

State Planning Commission Adopts NJ State Plan, Needs Assessments

State Planning Commission Adopts New Jersey State Plan, Impact Assessment, and Infrastructure Needs Assessment New Jersey State Development and Redevelopment Plan On December 17, 2025, the New Jersey State Planning Commission (SPC) adopted an updated New Jersey State...